New Seawall Bayward

Measure under the Seawall measures related to physical infrastructure opportunities to address flood risk

Looking for more? Head back to the Measures Explorer to check out other flood and seismic measures.


Steps down into the river Thames from the Thames Path on the north bank - London, UK © CAMimage / Alamy Stock Photo
DESCRIPTION:
A new seawall can be constructed in the water behind the alignment of the existing wharf structures and buildings. This location provides additional space to accommodate adaptation over time while not significantly increasing the fill area in the Bay. This seawall could be constructed using steel sheet piles, concrete caisson, and other structures.



PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE:
SHORELINE LOCATION: In Water





DESIGN LIFE:
ADAPTABILITY:
IMPACT ON THE WATERFRONT:
CONSTRUCTION COST:
100+ Years
High
Major Intervention
TBD




COASTAL FLOOD HAZARDS MITIGATED:





Sea Level Rise
Storm Surge
Groundwater
Waves
Erosion




MEASURES COMPATIBILITY:
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Measure may affect these shoreline values
Flood
Seismic
Tide Gates, Elevated Piers
Nearshore Buttress
Aquatic Habitat
Terrestrial Habitat
Water Quality
Carbon Storage




CONSIDERATIONS:

ADVANTAGES:

DISADVANTAGES:





  • Fill in Bay will require significant permitting challenges.

  • Works well with seismic measures.
  • Long design life, with robust foundation expected to last many years.
  • Passive flood protection solution, so no operational cost to deploy.
  • Waterside construction allows for less disruption to Promenade and Embarcadero usage from construction activities

  • Highly disruptive to some Port bulkhead or shed tenants.
  • Bay fill permitting considerations.
  • Settlement problem with potential impacts to existing landside infrastructure.




CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS TO THE PUBLIC:

SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION OPPORTUNITIES:

CASE STUDIES:





  • Construction can be completed from waterside and reduce impacts to the Promenade and Embarcadero.

  • Adaptation of seawalls is possible and can be factored into the design.
  • Increased foundation capacity and land provides room for adaptation to accommodate future sea levels.

  • Thames River, London, UK




DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES:





Ecological Enhancements

Urban Design

Form
  • Ecological concrete structures, stepped slopes, and other ecological enhancements can be applied to the waterside face of the new seawall to provide habitat.

  • Construction of new land at shoreline can provide new opportunities for public access spaces and uses.

  • New shoreline edge can have articulated edge and provide new forms of access to the waterfront.




DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:

  • When building the new seawall, the old bulkhead wall is encapsulated behind the new wall and fill.
  • Being in a relatively high seismic hazard alignment along the waterfront, any new wall would need to accommodate potential ground movement during a seismic event, consistent with USACE seismic standards.
  • New fill in the area just offshore has the potential to increase consolidation settlement of the young bay mud, which could impact the promenade, underground utilities and bulkhead buildings.


SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS:

  • Existing wharves and bulkhead buildings.
  • Wastewater outfall locations will add challenges but not impossible to work around.


URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:

  • New land on waterside of existing seawall provides many opportunities for urban design improvements, public access, and uses.


INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTABILITY CONSIDERATIONS:

  • Impact to the bulkhead buildings will be a challenge but eliminates most disruption to Embarcadero roadway and promenade relying mainly on marine equipment, or landside equipment working from new land east of the promenade.
  • Weak soils will present a challenge for placing new fill and staging equipment and materials.
  • Rock dike will likely pose additional constructability challenges for driving sheet pile just outboard of the rock dike.


ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • ADA transitions and access across the elevated stretch of wall/berm would require good urban design and accessibility layout.


HISTORICAL RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

  • Performing this work at or near bulkhead buildings will require significant consultation.
  • Bulkhead buildings would need to be dismantled, stored and re-assembled after the wall is in place and land behind is filled.


OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS

  • Low operational and maintenance costs; this is a passive flood protection solution.


Other Types of Seawalls:

Click the images and links below to check out other types of Seawalls.
Rip-Rap RevetmentNew Seawall In-Place



Head back to the Measures Explorer to check out other flood and seismic measures.


Measure under the Seawall measures related to physical infrastructure opportunities to address flood risk

Looking for more? Head back to the Measures Explorer to check out other flood and seismic measures.


Steps down into the river Thames from the Thames Path on the north bank - London, UK © CAMimage / Alamy Stock Photo
DESCRIPTION:
A new seawall can be constructed in the water behind the alignment of the existing wharf structures and buildings. This location provides additional space to accommodate adaptation over time while not significantly increasing the fill area in the Bay. This seawall could be constructed using steel sheet piles, concrete caisson, and other structures.



PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE:
SHORELINE LOCATION: In Water





DESIGN LIFE:
ADAPTABILITY:
IMPACT ON THE WATERFRONT:
CONSTRUCTION COST:
100+ Years
High
Major Intervention
TBD




COASTAL FLOOD HAZARDS MITIGATED:





Sea Level Rise
Storm Surge
Groundwater
Waves
Erosion




MEASURES COMPATIBILITY:
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Measure may affect these shoreline values
Flood
Seismic
Tide Gates, Elevated Piers
Nearshore Buttress
Aquatic Habitat
Terrestrial Habitat
Water Quality
Carbon Storage




CONSIDERATIONS:

ADVANTAGES:

DISADVANTAGES:





  • Fill in Bay will require significant permitting challenges.

  • Works well with seismic measures.
  • Long design life, with robust foundation expected to last many years.
  • Passive flood protection solution, so no operational cost to deploy.
  • Waterside construction allows for less disruption to Promenade and Embarcadero usage from construction activities

  • Highly disruptive to some Port bulkhead or shed tenants.
  • Bay fill permitting considerations.
  • Settlement problem with potential impacts to existing landside infrastructure.




CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS TO THE PUBLIC:

SEA LEVEL RISE ADAPTATION OPPORTUNITIES:

CASE STUDIES:





  • Construction can be completed from waterside and reduce impacts to the Promenade and Embarcadero.

  • Adaptation of seawalls is possible and can be factored into the design.
  • Increased foundation capacity and land provides room for adaptation to accommodate future sea levels.

  • Thames River, London, UK




DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES:





Ecological Enhancements

Urban Design

Form
  • Ecological concrete structures, stepped slopes, and other ecological enhancements can be applied to the waterside face of the new seawall to provide habitat.

  • Construction of new land at shoreline can provide new opportunities for public access spaces and uses.

  • New shoreline edge can have articulated edge and provide new forms of access to the waterfront.




DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:

  • When building the new seawall, the old bulkhead wall is encapsulated behind the new wall and fill.
  • Being in a relatively high seismic hazard alignment along the waterfront, any new wall would need to accommodate potential ground movement during a seismic event, consistent with USACE seismic standards.
  • New fill in the area just offshore has the potential to increase consolidation settlement of the young bay mud, which could impact the promenade, underground utilities and bulkhead buildings.


SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS:

  • Existing wharves and bulkhead buildings.
  • Wastewater outfall locations will add challenges but not impossible to work around.


URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:

  • New land on waterside of existing seawall provides many opportunities for urban design improvements, public access, and uses.


INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTABILITY CONSIDERATIONS:

  • Impact to the bulkhead buildings will be a challenge but eliminates most disruption to Embarcadero roadway and promenade relying mainly on marine equipment, or landside equipment working from new land east of the promenade.
  • Weak soils will present a challenge for placing new fill and staging equipment and materials.
  • Rock dike will likely pose additional constructability challenges for driving sheet pile just outboard of the rock dike.


ARCHITECTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • ADA transitions and access across the elevated stretch of wall/berm would require good urban design and accessibility layout.


HISTORICAL RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

  • Performing this work at or near bulkhead buildings will require significant consultation.
  • Bulkhead buildings would need to be dismantled, stored and re-assembled after the wall is in place and land behind is filled.


OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS

  • Low operational and maintenance costs; this is a passive flood protection solution.


Other Types of Seawalls:

Click the images and links below to check out other types of Seawalls.
Rip-Rap RevetmentNew Seawall In-Place



Head back to the Measures Explorer to check out other flood and seismic measures.


  • Thank you for learning about ways to strengthen the waterfront through the Measures Explorer! Please share your feedback on the New Seawall Bayward measure.

    Would you like to see it prioritized as a potential solution along San Francisco's waterfront? Do you have any concerns or input you would like to share about this measure?

    The Port wants to hear from you!

    Share Feedback